Consulting / AI-Ready Apps

Make Your iOS App AI-Ready for iOS 27

Every team is being told to make their app 'AI-ready' for iOS 27, and almost nobody agrees on what that means. For most apps it comes down to three jobs: Apple's on-device and server models where they fit, App Intents so Siri and Shortcuts can run your app, and a fallback for the large share of devices that cannot run the AI at all. Most apps need only some of these. I scope which ones pay off for yours, build those, and send you to the deeper page for each.

  • scoping what 'AI-ready' means for your app, so the budget goes to features your users can reach on the hardware they own
  • Apple's Foundation Models on-device and on Private Cloud Compute, plus the device-tier fallback that decides whether the feature ships at all
  • App Intents and assistant schemas, so Siri and Shortcuts can run your app without turning premium actions into free Siri commands
  • your own models through Core ML for the cases where Apple's fixed model is the wrong tool
Recognition
App Store Best New Apps 2026 Product Hunt Product of the Day 2025 CES Best of Innovation 2021 CES Innovation Award 2021 Webby Honoree 2021 Google Material Design 2020
Credentials
Member of British Computer Society 2024 BEng (Hons) 2017 Apple WWDC Scholarship 2015

Tell me what you're working on. I reply within 48 hours.


"Vadim was instrumental to the success Epsy enjoyed on iOS, taking it from an idea on a Miro board to the highest rated and most downloaded app of its kind on the store."

James C. · Mobile Engineering Lead, Epsy

"We had a strict deadline, and Vadim managed to complete the job in time. He gave us meaningful feedback and suggested better approaches, not trying to blindly stick to our specification."

Founder · Pre-seed streaming service

"I can say with confidence that it will be difficult to find a better developer. Vadim is achievement-oriented, highly organized, with very good communication skills."

Alex Z. · Co-Founder, eda.so




Advisory
£110
per hour

Architecture reviews, hiring help, second opinions on that thing that's been bugging you.

Retainer
£4,000
per month

Priority support: review agency code, join architecture calls, catch problems before they ship.


What does 'AI-ready' even mean? It feels like a marketing word.

It is vague, and that is half the problem. Concretely, for an iOS 27 app it means three things: you use Apple's on-device or server models where they fit, your app's actions are reachable from Siri and Shortcuts, and the feature still does something sensible on the devices that cannot run the AI. Most apps need one or two of those, not all three. The first thing I do is work out which, so you are not paying to build the parts your app does not need.

Do we need this now, or is it hype we can wait out?

Some of it waits, some of it does not. The user-facing Siri features land in stages and in English first, so the conversational payoff is a late-2026 story for most markets. App Intents, Spotlight, and Shortcuts work today and pay off immediately, which is why I usually start there. If most of your users are in the EU, the timing shifts again, because the new Siri is blocked there under the DMA while Shortcuts and Spotlight are not.

We already pay OpenAI or Anthropic. Does this cut that bill?

Maybe, for part of it. Apple's on-device model is free to call, and there is now a server tier, so prompts that fit those stop costing you per token. Apple has not published full server pricing, so anyone promising a zero bill is guessing. The prompts that need real reasoning may still belong with your current vendor. The Foundation Models page goes through which prompts move cleanly and which do not.

Our app is mostly used on older iPhones. Is any of this worth it for us?

Then the fallback is most of the value for you, and that is fine. iOS 27 runs back to the iPhone 11, but Apple's on-device AI needs much newer silicon, so a big share of your users cannot run it. The work that matters for you is making the feature do something useful for them, through a server call or a lighter path, instead of shipping an AI feature most of your base never sees. App Intents and Shortcuts do not need the AI silicon either, so those reach everyone.

How quickly can you start?

Advisory calls can happen within days. For project work, I typically need 1-2 weeks notice to clear the calendar, though I keep some buffer for urgent firefighting. Check the availability badges above for current openings.

Do you work with early-stage startups?

Yes, from pre-seed to Series C and beyond. For very early teams, the advisory tier often makes more sense than project work: you get architecture guidance without committing to a large engagement before you've validated the product.

What's included in the day rate?

Everything: code, architecture decisions, code review, documentation, async Slack availability during working hours. No surprise add-ons. I bill for time spent working on your project, not for "thinking about it in the shower."

We're in a different timezone. Will that slow things down?

I'm currently in Vancouver (PST), with full overlap for North American teams. For UK and Europe, I'm online by their afternoon. For Gulf or APAC, we'd agree on overlap hours and handle the rest async. I've worked with teams from San Francisco to Dubai.


Foundation Models & Apple IntelligenceApple's on-device model and the Private Cloud Compute tier for heavier prompts, with structured output your code can use directly. The full version, including the cost and privacy trade-offs, is on the Foundation Models page.
App Intents & the new Siriexposing your actions to Siri, Spotlight, and Shortcuts so the assistant can run your app, designed so it feeds your funnel instead of replacing it. Covered in depth on the App Intents page.
Core ML & your own modelswhen your value is a model you trained, Apple's fixed model is the wrong fit and Core ML is the right one. The on-device ML page goes into conversion, Vision, and size budgets.
The device-tier fallbackiOS 27 reaches back to the iPhone 11; Apple's on-device AI needs far newer silicon. The path for the users in that gap, whether a lighter feature, a server call, or an honest 'not on this device' state, is the work most demos skip and the part you are mostly paying for.
Evaluation & regressionan AI feature that works in the demo can quietly get worse after a model or OS update. Deciding how you would measure that, and catching it before your users do, is part of shipping AI you can stand behind.
Where to startmost teams do not need all of this. The scoping engagement decides the order, so the spend goes to the surface your users reach first rather than the one that demos best.


Where I've worked CV LinkedIn

Drobinin Limited Founder · 2025 - present 12+ apps from idea to App Store. Featured by Apple in EMEA & Americas.
LivaNova (NASDAQ: LIVN) Senior iOS · 2020-2025 Epsy, an epilepsy management app. Shipped inside an FDA-regulated medical-device company. HIPAA, CES Innovation Award.
Sphere (acquired by Twitter/X) Senior iOS · 2017-2020 Early Employee. $30M funding to acquisition.
VK.com iOS Consultant · 2016-2017 Authored & delivered an onsite course on iOS development.
ToBox Lead iOS · 2015-2016 Built team, MVVM architecture, full Swift rewrite.

Making your app AI-ready for iOS 27?

Tell me what you're working on. I reply within 48 hours.

work@drobinin.com